Saturday, July 22, 2017

Fair and Balanced Media

I was reading Time magazine the other day when something that I had heard for the last several years really hit me.  Someone had written in complaining about Time's coverage of Donald Trump Junior saying that both sides need to be presented.  The presenting of both sides is a recent phenomenon having risen with Fox news who presented a completely different point of view and in many cases completely wrong.  Now we have a President who calls out the fake news, the problem is that the organizations that he is calling out get it right more times than they get it wrong, whereas sources that he holds up as accurate are wrong way more than they are right.  Which brings us to the problem of presenting both side in a story.  What if the other side is completely wrong?  Fox said that they were fair and balanced but they never presented the other side, no balance.  The hated media would be doing a disservice if they presented as fact both sides of an argument particularly if one side is completely wrong.


Wisconsin Road funding

Admittedly our road funding is a mess, and now that we are experiencing unprecedented rainfall the lack of maintenance has really shown up.  There are those who think that the problem stems from not raising the gas tax for many years.  That is certainly one component of the problem.  A bigger source of the problem is when under the Thompson administration we began defunding the schools by allowing vacant land (including farms and forests) to be taxed at a lower rate.  This resulted in a big tax increase to people living in the cities and on rural developed land.  Well those taxes paid for more than schools, they also cover the roads.  Counties and townships now had less money coming in from taxes, less money from federal and state grants so they deferred the maintenance on roads.  The counties and townships could have solved this problem by funding their roads the way cities fund theirs by making each landowner pay half of the cost of the road.  The large landowners didn't think that this was fair and got their way.  Now we have reached the tipping point where the roads are crumbling and the GOP has no idea what to do.  It is clear that a gas tax increase would help but it is not the answer due to more fuel efficient vehicles.  Cutting what people are paid would also help (the GOP likes this idea because they believe that people working for the government shouldn't get paid).  Increasing the cost of car registration and linking it to vehicle weight would also help.  So would a use fee for farmers and loggers who drive heavy unlicensed equipment on the roads.  And I think that we'll need to make all highways toll roads.  That combination is the only way to get the money that we need.

Thursday, July 20, 2017

English Baby Denied Care

President Trump and the Pope have weighed in on a medical case in England where the doctors want to pull the plug on a baby that is going to die from an incurable condition.  I get the Pope's position, I do not get our President's position.  He is prepared to sign a bill (assuming that the dysfunctional Republicans can get something to him) that would have already killed this child.  That's right the party of pro-life is only concerned about life until just before birth.  They would make maternity care optional (cost a lot of money).  They would instill lifetime benefit caps (this child is already passed that).  They would reduce assistance.  Wasn't one of the Republican's complaints about Obama that he put the needs of people in foreign countries ahead of US citizens?  Apparently the current President didn't get the  memo.

$12/ year health insurance what a deal

The President proves in an interview that he doesn't know anything about health insurance by saying when you are young and putting $12 a year into insurance that by the time you're 70 you'll have a nice plan.  Sounds great, where do I sign up?  The problem with this idea is that he has confused health insurance with a retirement account and that is not how insurance works.  But the price tag is amazing, even if he meant $12 per month it would be a bargain.  The average American is paying close to 20 times that amount per month plus co-pays for office visits and drugs and these plans are bankrupting America.  I have no idea what the President was thinking on this one, but he is clearly wrong.

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Healthcare repeal and replace disaster

While I find it humorous that the Republicans can't come up with a replacement to Obamacare (they had 7 years to come up with a plan).  I find it more amazing that they can't get the votes for repeal either (the House voted 62 times to repeal and the Senate said if they had the majority it would be repealed).  Then the President blames the Democrats.  No Mr. President you are responsible for this, the Democrats are powerless to stop what you want.  You lost the support of Republican who believed you when you said that you would repeal Obamacare and replace it with something that give all Americans affordable access to healthcare.  Sadly the House and Senate bills would not provide affordable access to healthcare for all Americans.  The bills before Congress were going to leave millions without insurance and millions more priced out of the market and still millions who would be denied coverage.  As one analyst said the only people this plan would work for is a 27 year old male, with a good income, and no health problems.  It only works until they sick and dropped from their insurance or go bankrupt because they bought the cheap no coverage plan.